Pdf moral luck from bernard williams point of view researchgate. This is usually done by suggesting that cases in which luck appears to make a moral. At first, it clears types of moral luck, the control principle and its contradiction with moral luck, then after explaining. Bernard williams a new volume of philosophical essays by bernard williams. Though nagels paper was written as a commentary on williams, they have quite different. Nagel, williams, and moral luck bernard williams and. Due to its conflict to the control principle, to moral assessment, and to moral judgment and. Two responses to moral luck project muse johns hopkins. Thomas nagel and bernard williams have famously argued, we do not tend to excuse people for things they have done or failed to accomplish. The problem of moral luck had been discussed before nagels and williams articles, although not under the heading of moral luck. She has been accused of reading too much bernard williams into aristotle.
Much of the most interesting recent work in moral philosophy has been of basically kantian inspiration. I have presented versions of this paper at workshops and colloquia in aachen, berlin, and. The most popular response to the problem of moral luck has been of the second sort. Moral luck occurs when an agent can be correctly treated as an object of moral judgment despite the fact that a significant aspect of what she is assessed for depends on factors beyond her control. Moral luck by thomas nagel 1979 kant believed that good or bad luck should influence neither our moral judgment of a person and his actions, nor his moral assessment of himself. Abstract moral luck is an important issue in meta ethics. Quoted from the revised version reprinted in bernard williams, moral luck, cambridge. Nagel, in his reply to williams which was published under the same title. Pdf moral luck from bernard williams point of view. Thomas nagel 1979 and bernard williams 1981 introduced the concept of moral. Bernard williams in his essay morality an introduction to ethics published 1972 deals with what he believes are challenges to moral philosophy. One of the principal aims of bernard williamss work in moral philosophy1 is to provide a critique of ethical experience. Kant believed that good or bad luck should influence neither our moral judgment. Moral luck by thomas nagel 1979 university of colorado.
One of the principal aims of bernard williams s work in moral philosophy1 is to provide a critique of ethical experience. Moral luck contains a number of essays that have contributed influentially to this development. Moral luck occurs when an agent can be correctly treated as an object of. See farwell 1994, irwin 1988 and woodruff 1989 for helpful discussions of nussbaums book. Bernard williams writes, when i first introduced the expression moral luck. University of cambridge to print and sell all manner of books. The good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of its adequacy to achieve some proposed end. The literature on moral luck began in earnest in the wake of papers by thomas nagel and bernard williams. The work presented here is marked by a high degree of imagination and acuity, and also conveys a strong sense of. Bernard williams and thomas nagel begin their discussions of moral luck by contrasting morality with luck. Bernard williams, in his paper moral luck williams 1976, and thomas.
896 337 379 1579 810 1160 1573 410 299 294 609 257 1546 575 1515 1596 1335 681 1164 603 373 1343 767 286 1085 1269 95 224 56 1596 766 1014 974 1013 926 44 1026 792 356 490 132 239 930 1332 285 760 178 749